CHAPTER ONE

 

WELCOME TO THE MACHINE

 

 

        We have long understood that the cosmos is comprised of varying forms of matter, but the discovery that hydrogen atoms encompass a remarkable 99.9999999999996% emptiness turned our discernment of the material realm on its head! What was previously thought to constitute varying degrees of mass, was later discovered to be almost 100% nothingness!  To put this in perspective, if a hydrogen atom were the size of planet earth, the proton in the middle would measure about 600 feet across. That is the equivalent of two football fields laid end-to-end.

 

        What is the implication of this?

 

        It means that “reality” is chiefly a massive vacuum of void; a colossal corpus of atoms containing nothing but minuscule protons at their center. This leads to an obvious question: If matter is essentially made-up of empty space, why are humans not able to transcend this "material nothingness"? The answer it would seem, is that all matter is not solid but energy, and furthermore, these varying states of energy function via mathematical codes in the form of algorithms, and these presumed coding structures are the determining factor in which molecules interact with one another. In other words, the coding of matter is constructed in such a way that it constrains our perception of reality; our focus is intensely geared toward the material. Thus, in a basic sense, everything material is confined to the programmed dimensions of time and space. These dimensions—being a limitation placed upon the physical realm—infers the construct of existence is even more complex than we originally thought. Moreover, the inference that matter is a programmed structure invariably means it was developed consciously. If this is true, then a complete academic overhaul is required to formulate a contemporary conception of this phenomenon we identify as “reality”.

 

        Rationale of this kind has instigated a potential paradigm shift within certain factions of the scientific fraternity. This radical variation has emerged in the form of an innovative hypothesis that suggests the cosmos might be a sophisticated computer program.

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

        A major proponent of what is coined “Simulation Theory”, is Professor Nick Bostrom, a philosopher at the University of Oxford. Essentially, Bostrom posits that at least one of the following statements is likely to be true:

• The fraction of human-level civilizations that reach a post-human stage is very close to zero (i.e. mankind is likely to destroy himself before reaching a point of technological advancement in the area of creating simulated realities);

• The fraction of post-human civilizations that are interested in running ancestor-simulations is very close to zero (i.e. future civilizations have no interest in creating ancestral simulations);

• The fraction of all people with our kind of experiences that are living in a simulation is very close to one (i.e. we are already living in a computer simulation).

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

        It is the third of Bostrom’s suppositions that is receiving a substantial amount of interest among some highly respected physicists, including Professor S. James Gates, well-known for his work on supersymmetry theory. 

 

        In 2011, Gates publicly proclaimed he had unearthed a means of using strings of binary code to describe the fabric of the universe. He further declared this coding not only replicated the type used by current computer systems to navigate the World Wide Web, but that the code itself was an identical representation of one developed in 1948 by “the father of information theory”, Claude E. Shannon. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

​

​

        Regarding Shannon, in 2016 The New Yorker reported the following: “First and foremost, he introduced the notion that information could be quantified at all. In “A Mathematical Theory of Communication”, his legendary paper from 1948, Shannon proposed that data should be measured in bits—discrete values of zero or one…”

 

        It is these “discrete values of zero or one” (i.e. binary code) that Professor S. James Gates claims to have exposed as a method to describe and measure the construct of our universe. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

​

        The binary system is pivotal in the storage of information on computers; that is, the entirety of computerized data is made up of strings of one’s and zero’s—including audio, images, and video. The discovery of these “ones and zeros” underpinning the fabric of the universe—an exactness to the code developed by Claude Shannon—has understandably led Gates (among others) to theorize that humanity may indeed be residing in something akin to “The Matrix”.   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

​

​

 

​

        While Simulated Universe Theory has yet to be fully embraced by the mainstream scientific community, quantum physicists agree on one thing:  Mathematics is the underpinning operational mechanism to the nature of reality. In essence, this means reality is manufactured by digital information and the electrical signals in your brain interpret that data into what you define as “real”. This might sound like crazy-talk, but the conceptual hypothesis of reality being a computer program actually makes a great deal of sense; it not only explains some quantum conundrums (e.g. the observer effect and quantum entanglement), but may provide explanation as to the dictum of the ancient Pythagorean school that “All is number”. 

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

        If we accept the premise that all is number, then the universe should be quantifiable provided we are able to ascertain the germane code of the assumed computer program. Again, this is exactly what Professor Gates asserts he has discovered. However, to make such claim on the basis of binary alone is somewhat rudimentary. Not because Gates is wrong, but due to binary being a by-product of the source code. A code more complex than binary, yet paradoxically just as simplistic in its beauty. 

        

        How do I know this? Because I posses the basic conceptual coding framework of all life. 

        

        That might sound like the statement of a paranoid schizophrenic, but I believe upon subsuming all I present in this essay you will, at the very least, recognize that what you define as “reality” might in fact be something decidedly different. That what you have supposed about your existence and environment up to this point in time is actually quite constricted. (I do not intend to appear superior in making that statement, I am simply requesting you contemplate what I am proposing: That if “reality” is a form of computer program, then your entire understanding of what you thought was “real” is deceptive, and as such, your whole philosophy pertaining to the meaning you have ascribed to existence is perhaps in need of redress.) 

 

        I intend to share with you all I have unearthed; in time I will plunge headlong into the structure, form, and mathematics of the Creation code. However, prior to disclosure I would like to highlight an anomaly that has intrigued me throughout my years of research. Almost every academic I have heard/read discussing the phenomenon of Simulation Theory broaches the subject from a futuristic point of view. In fact, the applied title of “simulation” is quite bizarre: A simulation is a replication, and in order for a replication to exist it must have been plagiarized from an original program. Yet these “learned scholars” constantly posit the notion that a simulated reality could only transpire via the technologically sophisticated future ancestors of mankind. Subsequently, these scientists (in their haste to credit man with such genius) eliminate the more likely possibility that the original matrix—from which a simulation may have been counterfeited—is in fact a creation generated external to spacetime. And furthermore, that this creation of mathematical beauty was engineered by an entity that might be defined as God. For if The Matrix exists, and if we accept it is formulated upon a mathematical coding system, then we must also accept this system required a conscious programmer. 

       

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

​

        Science has incessantly rejected the notion of God based on a lack of evidence. Yet here, even in the face of data that distinctly alludes to the possibility of a universal Creator (e.g. Professor Gates’ binary codes representing a simulated reality) the academics still give little, if any credence to the concept of God. As such, science—by virtue of its presumed superior understanding—has painted itself into a corner; it cannot retract its stance on creationism in the simulation argument without losing face. Consequently, scientism substitutes the might of God with the presumed genius of future man; the preference for the latter founded on the scientific fraternity's zealous need to believe “men like them” (i.e. scientists) became gods in their own right by means of technological progression. The irony is, they are correct!

 

        I understand that last sentence appears contrary to my point concerning the original Creation program; it even seems to make no sense in the context of the discussion. However, the last chapter of this book will provide clarity on this issue. For a “great trick” has been waiting in the wings for eons, and mankind is being primed toward unquestioning acceptance of the aforementioned deception. If I were to disclose the intended ruse before offering context, the reader would likely pay little heed to the warning. As such, it is pivotal the seeker of truth become acquainted with the fact they reside in an artificially constructed world in which consciousness is the foundation of existence.       

​

​

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

​

​

​

        A person being introduced to the revolutionary idea that reality is a computer-generated universe, without investigation, would likely fob the idea off as the ramblings of a mental patient. As such, I encourage you to research absolutely everything I posit and take nothing I say as fact. This is the only way you can rest assured in the knowledge you obtain. For as I have discovered, the world is full of those who attempt to instil doubt through imperiously dictating that independent research automatically subsumes the label of ineptitude. Such is the conditioning of society. With this in mind, I ask of you one thing: That you consider the subject matter henceforth free of bias; that you be willing to set aside everything you thought you knew. For what you know, is not what is. Furthermore, I request you relinquish fear of thinking “abnormally”; have the courage to step away from the mainstream ideologies that have—with prodigious dogmatism—been drilled into your psyche since birth. To be bold is a requirement from here in. 

 

        On another note, some might perceive my "theories" reduce the spiritual quest of mankind to a mere, bland mathematical formula. This would be a misconception on behalf of the reader. The make-up of “reality” is constructed of code. The Spirit of God (which is the soul of man) is not subject to a definition of a materialistic capacity, it traverses time and space but has been corporeally trapped.

 

        Can I prove this assertion? No. Because to investigate these matters is only possible in YOUR mind. Hence, tangible evidence is limited to the material, and the material is an illusion based on the coding algorithms of "The Matrix". In other words, eternal matters cannot be categorically proven via temporal means; they can merely be implied through basic comprehension of the mathematical constructs of this reality. To obtain true inner “knowing” you must walk your own path, invest in an understanding beyond the obvious, and above all, have faith in the transpiration of the symbolism that takes place around you. For every day signs are given, messages “whispered”, and gentle endorsements of a synchronistic nature revealed—constant occurrences intended to sensitively steer us toward truth. These are signs most people ignore because they are too caught up in living what they think is life, when in actuality, they are merely pawns of the material world’s decree unwittingly being steered toward annihilation...

​

​

 

        As a society we routinely receive diktat on how we must live and think through “the system”, whereby, we are instructed to conform to the norm or face derision, rejection, and/or expulsion; the fear of which often overpowers logic resulting in conformity against (what should be) our better judgement. On this matter let me state: To conform out of fear leads to spiritual death, whilst compliance based on a belief that something is right/moral is an act of virtue. Hence, it naturally follows that acting morally leads to truth. This being the case, acceptance of truth external to mainstream dogmatism requires an act of boldness, and if this supposition is also true, then we must further concede that people who conform to the consensus gentium void of independent thought do so out of fear.

 

        Fear can be used as a means to gain compliance and is a tactic deliberately employed by those in control of this world. These tyrants understand the emotion of fear can be utilised as an awfully potent conditioning agent. To demonstrate, consider the “Little Albert Experiment” of 1920, where an infant, Albert, was primed to be afraid of a white rat through association of the aforementioned critter with a loud noise. Initially, the toddler had no fear of the rodent but, over time, became terrified when he was in the animal's presence. This was due to Albert's expectation that the rat would be accompanied by a frightening clang.

 

        And THAT my friend is how easy it is to control mass amounts of people!     

​

        If you pause for a moment and consider the current state of the world, you will discover the communications we receive through the propaganda machine (i.e. the mainstream media) are entirely fear based. War on this, terror that, global financial crisis this, economic collapse that, new virus strain, climate change, overpopulation, impending environmental catastrophe... All of it designed to keep you living in a manner that does not threaten the status quo. Keeping people in a perpetual state of fear makes them easy to control, it stops them thinking in any depth outside of the fear generating issues. In other words, the variables causing the fear become the primary focus and accepted "reality". Consequently, truth is distorted to fit the agenda of the governing faction.      

 

        In terms of discerning truth, the virtue of intuition always testifies to what is right; not what we desire to be truth, but what is truth. However, the beauty of that particular sense has been blunted by the pace of the material world in combination with its sensory overload and technological “progress”. As a result, we have disconnected not only from God, but each other, and ourselves. Instead, who we think we are is dependent upon the dictate of the mainstream, and the mainstream is nothing but a system of lies. It is a system that has the capacity to generate a global population of mindless drones who think they think for themselves, but in actuality are dependent upon a construct designed to (purposefully) ensnare. Unfortunately, the majority are already lost. They fail to investigate, acknowledge, or consider the imminent spiritual danger, and at the time of writing I can assuredly confirm this peril is most certainly looming expeditiously. 

 

        The dulling of intuitive instinct is a legacy of society’s conditioned infatuation with all things material. This is evident in the lust and constant pursuit of hedonism as if it were the purpose of existence. And yet, the pleasure attained never seems to sustain. This is because the acquisition of “stuff” and the accompanying buzz feelings generated only eliminate the unconscious "soulful ache" momentarily. For those still somewhat attuned, the spiritual reminder lingers in their core. A reminder in the form of a slight inkling that “something” is missing. A something that was once a common element of the human condition: A sense of self, a sense of purpose, a sense of community, and a connection to Creation and Creator. And yet, the masses move along in haste—they have "stuff" to acquire—totally ignorant they are being herded toward spiritual oblivion. 

 

        Alternately, some no longer even care, either lost to the lure of the material or having fallen for the trap that a belief in God is tantamount to idiocy. Others have fallen prey to the religion of scientism—the process of measuring only the tangible—trusting every theory submitted that “proves” God is merely a fabrication of delusional, uneducated people. And then there are those who do believe in God but are locked into various rigid paradigms; belief systems that demand

their particular denomination to be the truth. Hence, having "the truth" means they no longer need to seek. 

Subsequently, these disciples only think from a singular perspective and in so doing, limit their capacity to discern greater wisdom. Most of these types, if they are honest, believe in God out of fear. Fear they must kowtow or suffer eternally burning in hell. However, they would never admit this, instead they pretend their fear is love. They are self-deceivers; willing to lie for the sake of pretending they are more spiritually evolved than those they pretend not to judge.

​

        You see, the system is prone to lies because people are egotistical and incredibly subjective in their appraisal of the world and their existence. By nature humans are liars. We all lie, mostly to ourselves. As a consequence, we stunt our growth in every way imaginable for fear of being vulnerable. Yet vulnerability is the only means by which intimacy is made possible. Thus, connection with ourselves, others, and God can only be achieved through truth—the ultimate love. 

 

        In today’s world, truth is no longer valued. It has in fact been deliberately twisted so as not to offend those living their lies. Furthermore, these distortions of reality are an easy means by which those in control are able to splinter entire populaces. It is the age-old strategy of divide and conquer and is being implemented to incite war on every level of consciousness to deliberately spawn chaos.    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

​

​

        The courageous Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn once said, “To destroy a people, you must first sever their roots”. Although its sentiment is somewhat lost on most, my use of Solzhenitsyn’s quote is particular to the manner in which he himself used it: The conspiracy to destroy Christianity through demolition of Western civilization. 

 

        I understand there will be those among you who perceive the annihilation of Christianity to be a productive step for the “progression” of mankind. If this is the case, I offer the following warning: Your new religion, whether you like it or not, will be obeisance to a despotic government controlled by a ruling elite that demand you adhere to communist ideology. Those in control of the new system will not be subject to the conditions they impose on others, instead, they will live in luxury off the back of your indentured servitude. 

​

        If you consider the above statement to be a paranoid assessment of the world and its destiny, then you have likely been too reliant on mainstream media for your “news”. The more awake among you will comprehend the deep state has already infiltrated not only the West, but almost the entire globe. This might lead one to ask, “How is this presumed end game any different to the present state of the world?” What needs to be understood is this: The enemies of God have yet to systematize the intended resolution of a World Government. When this plan reaches fruition, your civil liberties will be obliterated—there will be no privacy (including your thoughts), no freedom (including ownership of property), and no truth. 

​

        At the time of writing there is an ideological war taking place on traditional Western values. This is a meticulously devised plan implemented by evil to tear apart the last remaining threads of the moral fabric of society. It is devised to destabilize the world in preparation for “the solution”; a pre-arranged answer that will be fully embraced by those caught in the web of chaos. This “solution” will initially appear to be a viable means to end the suffering, but beware of the wolf in sheep’s clothing: “If you want a vision of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face–forever” (1984, George Orwell).   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

​

​

​

​

​

​

        We are headed for some arduous, calamitous times. Do not lose hope. This creeping spiritual death will be halted for those who believe. 

 

        Believe in what? The answer to that question is contained within these pages. 

 

        In terms of the content herewith, I expect ridicule and worse. However, I refuse to remain silent or to toe the mainstream dictate. As discussed, the latter is a systemic problem in today’s society—people accept the lies they are fed and therefore think themselves “informed”. These types know enough to make them vexations to those sincerely seeking truth; they do the work of the malevolent force without even being aware they are doing it. They are mind-controlled yet too ignorant/arrogant to consider this a possibility. They are blind prisoners of their own skewed cognitions; the result of layers of indoctrination that have never been critically assessed. As such, they will remain trapped until they are courageous enough to think for themselves. 

 

        In order to acquire knowledge outside of the dominant system of brainwashing, my former comfort zones had to be stretched and annihilated. There were times I literally felt as though I were on the edge of a precipice in respect to opening my mind to unconventional possibilities likely perceived as nuts by "the obedient". However, I have come to recognize that such limitation in thinking is, yet again, a mechanism of fear. Thus, unlike those confined by the necessity to maintain reputation and status among their peers (too cowardly to state an opinion contrary to the majority) or those conniving to deliberately conceal knowledge, I will avow exactly what I believe I have been guided to expose: Conspicuous evidence of Creation and conspiracy. 

 

        Decide for yourself…